Peter Van Aulen
Google Rating
4.6(83 reviews)
- 50 Market Street Saddle Brook, NJ 07663, The Law Offices of Peter Van Aulen - 50 Market Street
- +1-201-845-7400
- No email available
About:
Peter Van Aulen's Practice is 100% dedicated to Divorce and Family Law. He is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Attorney. Said designation is only granted to attorneys who have shown higher levels of education, knowledge, ability and experience in family law and divorce. Peter completed many more Continuing Legal Education classes in family law than is required by the non certified lawyer and passed an extensive exam. He has been positively assessed by judges and other attorneys. Peter Van Aulen has been representing clients in divorce and family law for over 30 years. He has successfully represented hundreds of divorce clients. What has made the difference for Peter’s clients beside his extensive experience is that he is totally committed to facilitate the best possible outcome. He passionately represents his client’s interests. Peter is also a member of the Bergen County Early Settlement Panel. The panel of two to three experienced divorce attorneys hears presentations from other attorneys of unresolved divorce cases. Peter has volunteered his time as a panelist and assisted a number of other attorneys in settling their cases. In addition, Peter was an adjunct professor of law. He has written or edited over 300 articles that are located on his website in the areas of divorce and family law. Peter is a panelist and lecturer on divorce law at continuing legal education seminars for lawyers. In in fact he chaired two panels on New Jersey's alimony laws at a lawyer's conference in 2018. The combination of Peter’s practical and academic experience benefits his clients. Peter offers a free initial consultation. Call him today at (201) 845-7400.
Jurisdiction:New Jersey, 3rd Circuit, U.S. District Court of New Jersey, U.S. Supreme Court
Practice Area
Family Law
Handles divorce, custody, parenting time, and support with DV-informed safety planning, temporary orders, safe exchanges, discovery protections, and long-term financial stability.
Languages
English
Fees
Free Consultation
Education
J.D.
Awards
Distinguished Alumni Award
Top Attorney Award
Distinguished Peer Rating
10 Best Attorneys For Client Satisfaction List
Super Lawyer
10.0 Superb Rating
Associations
Member
Member
Reviews
RATED 5.0
Aug 7, 2025via Google
Joe DeVleming
"Very helpful consultation on a family law matter that resolved my issue without further follow-up. Thanks!"
RATED 5.0
Jul 20, 2025via Google
Christine Ellinger
"Mr. Van Aulen handled my Hudson County divorce after I had moved to NV. He is very knowledgeable, honest and had my best interest as a priority. This entire process was new for me, and he made me feel comfortable every step of the way. I don’t know what I would’ve done without him. And his staff! Debbie is absolutely wonderful. She always made me feel like I was a priority. I’d like to say I will definitely use Peter’s services again, but I hope I never have to. 😊"
RATED 1.0
Jul 10, 2025via Google
L R
"On June 3, 2025, I consulted Mr. Peter Van Aulen about legal representation in a matter. On June 4th, I received the Retainer Agreement. On careful review of the Retainer Agreement, I found that 2/3 of the Retainer focused exclusively on Legal Fees, Costs and Expenses, Bills and Other Legal Services, with no detailed description on Scope of Work. Mr. Van Aulen requested a $6,000.00 retainer fee and said nothing more than the payment will go toward fees and expenses according to the Agreement. I had no written assurance that Mr. Van Aulen understood my specific goals and objectives. Despite good faith attempts at getting Mr. Van Aulen to include Scope of Work in the Retainer Agreement, he refused. I decided to pursue another attorney. Mr. Van Aulen may be a good attorney, but his unwillingness to provide me with a detailed plan was unacceptable to me. This was very telling and unfortunate. I do not recommend The Law Office of Mr. Peter Van Aulen for this alone. Dear Reader: In response to Mr. Van Aulen reply, consider what he said. “We do not provide a “detailed plan” in a retainer agreement because we formulate the same after we been retained, review both parties’ Case Information Statements, review all relevant documents and further consultation with the client.” In effect, Mr. Van Aulen is saying pay me now and worry about the details after the fact, whereas I maintain that memorialization of Scope of Work is critical upfront, not on the backend, to ensure that he understood the goals and objectives discussed. I have made meaning business happen for both small and large companies, and under no circumstances would a business partner enter into a contractual agreement without a “detailed plan” as Mr. Van Aulen puts it, or a Scope of Work as I put. In closing, my review is based solely on “my” personal experience; it is not intended to disparage or defame Mr. Van Aulen. This is nothing more than a matter of differing perspectives, or expectations. I wish Mr. Van Aulen the best. You the reader can draw your own conclusions."
RATED 5.0
Jul 10, 2025via Google
Aber Weiss
"Got the outcome I was looking for. Thank you"
RATED 5.0
Jun 10, 2025via Google
Pillar Planning
"Peter was so helpful prompt and knowledgeable... His understanding, listening and advice through the process is stellar... Top notch!"
Connect to our therapy partners
